On Sunday, March 18, 2018 at 2:26:57 AM UTC-7, Steven Petruzzellis wrote:
Being decentralized as it is, low-level programming will never go away bu=
t it'll never be a big hit. How is failing synaptic connections tied to fla= tlining brain waves in any way going to lead to enlightened usenet writing?=
To my way of thinking, spending time getting informed is never wasted time=
.. Thinking you know more than everyone else and trying to convince people t= hat it's true? THAT is a waste ;) It was Vennie Bowden, Realtor who got cau= ght using untold numbers of nyms repeatedly, and these are 'people' who com=
e out of the blue straight into threads where he was being proved wrong... = continuously for over a decade. If Vennie Bowden, Realtor calls getting sho= ved into kill filters left and right by Aragorn and me (and completely tras= hing his name and any reason for advocates to believe anything he has to sa=
y - for the rest of time) successful 'trolling', then no doubt... he is a g= reat troll. I do not personally go along with that definition, I use anothe=
r term. I call him a complete ass.=20
=20
And in response you have nothing but a crack to start a troll-fest.=20
=20
=20
=20
--
My Snoring Solution! http://www.5z8.info/backyard-fireworks-disasters_t7w7pu_bombbuilding
Jonas Eklundh Communication
Carroll, 4/10/2015 4:04 PM:
-----
Cute trick... To the guy who hacked my Google account.
-----
No details. Seems to treat it as a joke.
Carroll, 4/10/2015 5:02 PM, <
https://goo.gl/51rsmZ>:
-----
Email Hacking Is A Serious Crime
----- =20
No longer "cute"... now it is a serious crime. OK.
Carroll, 4/10/2015 5:07 PM:
By now he is posting more links to how serious this crime against him is.
Carroll, 4/10/2015 7:25 PM:
-----
I didn't write that.
-----
Now he is denying the posts from his own account. OK, he was "hacked". Some= one else posted this. Hard to hack a gmail account given how they use two-s= tep authentication and someone would need access to his phone or the like..=
.. but at least POSSIBLE.=20
Even then, though, if someone tries to guess your password Google alerts yo=
u and lets you know what IP address and other info. I know because someone =
in a Denver internet cafe has tried mine on several occasions.
Google even forces you to change your password when this happens. Very hard=
to hack these days.=20
So already Carroll's story is unlikely.=20
But let us accept it... someone somehow hacked his account bypassing the tw=
o step verification. This person did not, however, change his password and = Carroll posted within an hour of the "hacker". Before that, unless he is an=
idiot, he changed his password and the "hacker" was locked out. The "hacke=
r" got one post in.=20
But Carroll could not leave his story there.
Carroll, 4/10/2015 8:36 PM, <
https://goo.gl/NJ2bMH>:
-----
Someone hacked my fretwizzer gmail acct so, for the time being,
don't trust anything from it.
-----
Wait. What? Even after Carroll figured out this "hacker" who was too stupid=
to change his password had broken into his account and Carroll *surely* mu=
st have changed his own password, he is saying the "hacker" might still hav=
e access. Might be able to break Google's two-step verification process *ag= ain*.=20
This is *very* unlikely... to the point of being unbelievable.=20
Even worse for him: he notes which of his accounts he is claiming was hacke=
d - but in the past he has denied even using the other accounts! LOL! He sc= rewed up and made it very clear he has multiple accounts and felt the need =
to note which one. He made the same mistake in the next quote where he spea=
ks of WHICH of his gmail accounts he is claiming was hacked. Oops! If he on=
ly posts with one there would be no need to specify which one!
He has completely screwed up in his game to pretend he posts with only one = gmail account. Completely idiotic of him, too!
Carroll, 4/10/2015 8:38 PM, <
https://goo.gl/YA7gMO>:
-----
Some mentally deficient child hacked my 'fretwizzer' gmail account
so I may have to kill it. For the time being, don't assume
anything that's coming from it was written by me.
-----
He is still saying that he may have to kill the account instead of just cha= nging the password which anyone with half a brain would have already done (= and Google *forces* you to do when someone even tries to hack your account.= ... I know because someone in the Denver area has tried to hack mine multipl=
e times... likely Carroll but I have no proof of this). And he specifies WH= ICH of his accounts! He is directly admitting he uses more than one account=
! His claim of being "forged" with his second account is a lie. Proved.
Carroll, 4/10/2015 8:40 PM, <
https://goo.gl/j6yCuV>:
-----
Looks like it's still being hacked despite me taking precautions,
I may have to kill the account.
-----
What makes it look like its still being hacked? And what precautions other = than changing the two-step verification options does he need? And how would=
someone bypass this... is he really on the NSA watch list? Seems you would=
need someone at that level to be doing this. He watches too much TV where = they computer hackers spend thirty seconds and bypass all security.
Just nonsense.
Carroll, 4/11/2015 12:05 PM:
-----
Apparently Google is having issues with their accounts to the
point where they're ready to undertake some additional measures.
-----
But, of course, no evidence of this... and what measures? They already aler=
t users if someone else tries to guess your password and use two-step authe= ntication and even force you to make a new password if it seems someone is = trying to hack you.
-----
They're now involving several federal agencies in things they
didn't bother with previously in an effort to deal with people who
hack into accounts. They've asked me to leave the account open.
-----
So now Google is letting Carroll know how they are handling these things - = and asking him to leave a *hacked* account open... one someone can be using=
to steal his identity. No. This does not pass the sniff test in any way. E= ven if they were doing this for some bizarre sting operation, which is in i= tself far fetched, they would have told Carroll to not make it public infor= mation so the hacker would not know.
Just insanity. His own story is so idiotic and full of idiotic claims it si= mply cannot be true. Carroll uses his secondary Google account - the one he=
accesses via Tor and is referred to as his Tor account - to have plausible=
deniability for things he says there. Now he is working to do the same thi=
ng with his main account. Maybe Carroll read a report like this: <
http://cn= nmon.ie/111QeT8> [money.com]. If so he missed the part where they note if y=
ou are *really* hacked, which is rare, the hackers change your password and=
lock you out. Why would they not?
-----
There's some new legislation that will help them deal with this
issue... which probably means more BS for us ;)
-----
Yes, new legislation to make sure Carroll does not have to deal with "hacke= rs" and "forgers" which do not even exist.=20
The funny part is, this happened shortly after someone in the Denver area, = likely Carroll, tried to guess *my* passwords and they did it from an Inter= net caf=C3=A9 (Google tells you the IP and that can be used to trace back).= =20
My guess: Carroll is the one who was working to guess my password and figur=
ed this new lie of his was a good way to deny his own words even more than =
he does with his Tor account *and* a way to make it so if I had talked abou=
t him trying to hack my account he could say I was just copying his comment=
s. "Proving" I read his posts... which for now I am to see how absurd his l= ies are. :)
Carroll, 4/11/2015 12:25 PM:
-----
The person who hacked into my Gmail acct. changed the wording on
this post. I've removed the others but Google asked me to leave
one standing for some odd reason.=20
-----
Here Carroll claims the hacker changed the wording on a post of his from *b= efore* he had even claimed he was hacked. So this hacker not only can *post=
* for him but edit his old Usenet posts.
I call utter bullshit on this. Out and out lie from Carroll. And then Carro=
ll says Google asked him to not delete these "hacked" posts... this is nons= ense. Why would Google want him to leave forged posts in the public and why=
would Google not just keep their own copy? Even Carroll notes it is for "s= ome odd reason" - yeah, because Carroll is telling stories that make *no* s= ense at all.
Carroll is lying. Maybe there is some kernel of truth to his stories? Even =
if so - and frankly it is unlikely he will ever show any evidence to back h=
is claims - the details he is posting are absurd.
Carroll, 4/11/2015 2:10 PM:
-----
And he's so high he thinks people still have to manually enter all
their passwords in whenever they want to use anything that's been
password protected ;)
-----
Nobody had suggested, hinted, implied, or said anything like what Carroll s= ays they did.
Maybe his story will be someone stole his laptop (or mobile device) and he = had his passwords saved? If so why not have the device deactivated remotely=
? Why has he not said anything about this?=20
My guess: he realizes he screwed up when trying to guess my passwords and i=
s now building a story so he can say his computer was stolen and it was not=
him. Or, LOL, maybe someone broke into his house and did it.=20
This unknown hacker knew he was obsessed with me and carried on acting like=
him. Makes complete sense, eh?
Carroll, 4/12/2015 8:45 AM, <
https://goo.gl/KMf4pa>:
-----
The first one, that has since been deleted. My bad for having such
a feeble password on this account.
-----
Now he suggests it was merely from someone guessing his password - which co= ntradicts his above insinuations that it could have been from a saved passw= ord on a device he had.
His story changes with the telling.
But as noted, when someone tries to guess your password Google has ways to = deal with it. I know - Carroll or someone in his neck of the woods recently=
tried it with me.
Carroll, 4/12/2015 9:29 AM:
-----
The account in question here is a gmail account. Contrary to
Snit's delusions, I have no idea what a TOR account looks like but
it's a good bet it doesn't bear much of a resemblance to a gmail
account.=20
-----
Here Carroll plays stupid and pretends that if when he or anyone uses the T=
or browser *Carroll* pointed to this somehow changes the way the gmail inte= rface looks. Um, no. Worse it might do is make Google think you are in anot= her country and you would have to set it back to English. But the basic loo=
k stays the same.
He is playing stupid and pretending to not know how the Tor browser he poin= ted to works. Just idiotic of him.
-----
That idiocy aside, I love how Snit has repeatedly, for years,=20
feigned ignorance about gmail accounts, yet, he keeps disclosing
info that proves he knows about them. Some fools do stuff like
this when they believe people are as stupid as the fool needs them
to be ;)
-----
I do not think Google would allow you to edit your Usenet / groups posts bu=
t I do not use it much and do not know for sure. Seems absurd that they wou= ld... and others have now said they do not. But given how I do not use Goog=
le Groups for posting why would I know the details of their system for cert= ain?=20
Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:47 PM:
-----
Your obsession with me is insane. Working with Google I now have
proof you and ebot worked together to hack me. Clever. If I press
charges against you I have to also include her so you remain safe
for now.
Do not think this is over.
-----
=20
No evidence of working with Google on this (and all out and out lies). Carr= oll is making public threats based on lies.=20
Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:50 PM:
-----
I promised COLA your trolling days were over so you contacted ebot
and worked with her to hack my account. I might not be able to get
your ass handed to you in court over this but wait until your boss
at Yavapai College contacts you.
Maybe you should make that call first. Ask about your comments on
incest.
See if those can not be quoted.
-----
=20
Direct lies and threats by Carroll.
Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:51 PM:
-----
You went too far this time Snit. We have trolled each other for
years but to contact ebot and get her to help you hack my account
was over a line.
-----
=20
A complete and utter lie from Carroll.=20
Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:52 PM:
-----
The above post is Snit hacking my account.
-----
A complete and utter lie... more false accusations from him.
Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:53 PM:
-----
You edited those posts when you hacked my account. Do not trust
anything from my fretwizzer account now that Snit and ebot have
access to it.
-----
More unsupported claims and attacks by Carroll.
Carroll, 4/16/2015 8:56 PM:
-----
Working with Google I now have proof Snit and ebot hacked the
account. Many of the older posts were edited. You can see evidence
of this by Snit pointing to "old" posts which have been modified to
say I claimed I was his "personal newsgroup rapist", a phrase I
have never used.
-----
=20
No evidence of Carroll working with Google. No evidence of any older posts = being edited.
--
What Every Entrepreneur Must Know!!
https://youtu.be/HMx0RyzbPgQ
Jonas Eklundh
--- MBSE BBS v1.0.7.2 (GNU/Linux-x86_64)
* Origin: The Kofo System II BBS (110:300/11@linuxnet)