Virtual Private Server (VPS) Hosting provided by Central Point Networking cpnllc.com
For some reason, the "Nodelist" and "Recent Callers" features are not working.
| Sysop: | Ray Quinn |
|---|---|
| Location: | Visalia, CA |
| Users: | 50 |
| Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
| Uptime: | 40:11:15 |
| Calls: | 2 |
| Files: | 11,854 |
| Messages: | 148,244 |
Check out the US 99 menu above for links to information about US Highway 99, after which the US 99 BBS is named.
Be sure to click on the Amateur Radio menu item above for packet BBSes, packet software, packet organizations, as well as packet how-to's. Also included is links to local and some not-so-local Amateur Radio Clubs.
Running on a system that has no swap, and it seems users can use so much =memory that it causes the machine to have kernel processes or drivers crash=
=20to all user processes. Or lacking that, for a particular user across all = that user's processes.
I'm looking for a way to limit the total amount of user memory available =
=20it in ulimit doesn't quite do the trick, because I want to allow a user to = have a ton of small processes, or one very large one (up to some limit wher=
Unfortunately, setting a "max processes" and "max memory per process" lim=
=20
Any suggestions?
=20
Thanks in advance!
Joe C
Running on a system that has no swap, and it seems users can use so muchmemory that it causes the machine to have kernel processes or drivers crash.
I'm looking for a way to limit the total amount of user memory available toall user processes. Or lacking that, for a particular user across all that user's processes.
Unfortunately, setting a "max processes" and "max memory per process" limitin ulimit doesn't quite do the trick, because I want to allow a user to have a ton of small processes, or one very large one (up to some limit where it can use almost all the RAM, but leave enough for kernel).
Any suggestions?
Thanks in advance!
Joe C
Running on a system that has no swap, and it seems users can use so
much memory that it causes the machine to have kernel processes or
drivers crash.
I'm looking for a way to limit the total amount of user memory
available to all user processes. Or lacking that, for a particular
user across all that user's processes.
Unfortunately, setting a "max processes" and "max memory per process"
limit in ulimit doesn't quite do the trick, because I want to allow a
user to have a ton of small processes, or one very large one (up to
some limit where it can use almost all the RAM, but leave enough for
kernel).
Any suggestions?
Running on a system that has no swap, and it seems users can use so muchmemory that it causes the machine to have kernel processes or drivers crash.
I'm looking for a way to limit the total amount of user memory available toall user processes.
Or lacking that, for a particular user across all that user's processes.
Unfortunately, setting a "max processes" and "max memory per process" limitin ulimit doesn't quite do the trick,
because I want to allow a user to have a ton of small processes, or one verylarge one (up to some limit where it
can use almost all the RAM, but leave enough for kernel).
Any suggestions?
On 03/06/18 16:01,=20h memory that it causes the machine to have kernel processes or drivers cra= sh.
Running on a system that has no swap, and it seems users can use so muc=
=20
Seems like you have too little memory on that machine for it's task, the
only time I would say it's OK to skip swap is if the amount of RAM do be
well dimensioned for your task.
On 03/06/18 16:01, joecook@gmail.com wrote:memory that it causes the machine to have kernel processes or drivers crash.
Running on a system that has no swap, and it seems users can use so much
Seems like you have too little memory on that machine for it's task, the
only time I would say it's OK to skip swap is if the amount of RAM do be
well dimensioned for your task.
I would recommend you to get some swap, best if you have a swap
partition, but a swap file works too, but set a low swapiness (1 or 2%),
so that you will not use the swap until it really is needed, as
everything that has ended up in the swap will be really slow.
all user processes.I'm looking for a way to limit the total amount of user memory available to
Or lacking that, for a particular user across all that user's processes.
What you can do, depends much on how you have setup your server to php.
You could try to use firejail, if you use the standard apache/php setup,
then you need to firejail the apache, if you use fpm, then it's just the fpm-php that needs to be firejail:ed.
Look at the rlimit options.
If you want to be even more advanced, you can run a container with
memory limitation and run the web server/php inside the container, sure
there will be some nasty side effects when trying to use more memory,
but shouldn't affect the host too badly.
in ulimit doesn't quite do the trick,Unfortunately, setting a "max processes" and "max memory per process" limit
very large one (up to some limit where itbecause I want to allow a user to have a ton of small processes, or one
can use almost all the RAM, but leave enough for kernel).
There ain't good default limits for what you want to do and even if you modify users ulimit values, depending on your setup, the configuration
may not affect php as it tends to be run as nobody.
Any suggestions?
firejail or lxc (or docker, but it can mess up things)
--
//Aho
Sandman:
<http://usenet.sandman.net/misc/snit_flood> It doesn't show what
interval the script is run at, but how he has used it, at least in
the beginning. I stopped logging it this way back in may :)
From what I've personally looked at, it looks like it's all over the
map.
Sandman:
Maybe I'll update it :)
What would it take to do that?
On Tuesday, March 6, 2018 at 1:38:08 PM UTC-5, J.O. Aho wrote:development
On 03/06/18 16:01,
Running on a system that has no swap, and it seems users can use so much memory that it causes the machine to have kernel processes or drivers crash.
Seems like you have too little memory on that machine for it's task, the
only time I would say it's OK to skip swap is if the amount of RAM do be
well dimensioned for your task.
It's more that the system has no hard-drive and is in development.
In the end it will have plenty of memory to do its task, but during
it's too easy to have developers mess it up and cause the need to reboot.
I'd rather the user processes just be killed with a bad_alloc or the like.
Running on a system that has no swap, and it seems users can use so muchmemory that it causes the machine to have kernel processes or drivers crash.
I'm looking for a way to limit the total amount of user memory available toall user processes. Or lacking that, for a particular user across all that user's processes.
Unfortunately, setting a "max processes" and "max memory per process" limitin ulimit doesn't quite do the trick, because I want to allow a user to have a ton of small processes, or one very large one (up to some limit where it can use almost all the RAM, but leave enough for kernel).
Any suggestions?
On 03/07/18 03:41, joecook@gmail.com wrote:memory that it causes the machine to have kernel processes or drivers crash.
On Tuesday, March 6, 2018 at 1:38:08 PM UTC-5, J.O. Aho wrote:
On 03/06/18 16:01,
Running on a system that has no swap, and it seems users can use so much
development
Seems like you have too little memory on that machine for it's task, the >> only time I would say it's OK to skip swap is if the amount of RAM do be >> well dimensioned for your task.
It's more that the system has no hard-drive and is in development.
In the end it will have plenty of memory to do its task, but during
it's too easy to have developers mess it up and cause the need to reboot. I'd rather the user processes just be killed with a bad_alloc or the like.
I would separate the development of the system and software, my
experience from developing systems/software is that things just gets
messy when doing those in the same place at the same time, and worse if
the development machine suddenly becomes a live system.
--
//Aho
On 2018-03-06, joecook@gmail.com <joecook@gmail.com> wrote:h memory that it causes the machine to have kernel processes or drivers cra= sh.
Running on a system that has no swap, and it seems users can use so muc=
e to all user processes. Or lacking that, for a particular user across al=I'm looking for a way to limit the total amount of user memory availabl=
imit in ulimit doesn't quite do the trick, because I want to allow a user t=Unfortunately, setting a "max processes" and "max memory per process" l=
Any suggestions?=20
Turn off overcommit. (I think you use sysconfig to do that)
=20
--=20
This email has not been checked by half-arsed antivirus software
On 2018-03-06, joecook@gmail.com <joecook@gmail.com> wrote:
Running on a system that has no swap, and it seems users can use so
much memory that it causes the machine to have kernel processes or
drivers crash.
I'm looking for a way to limit the total amount of user memory
available to all user processes. Or lacking that, for a particular
user across all that user's processes.
Unfortunately, setting a "max processes" and "max memory per
process" limit in ulimit doesn't quite do the trick, because I want
to allow a user to have a ton of small processes, or one very large
one (up to some limit where it can use almost all the RAM, but leave
enough for kernel).
Any suggestions?
Turn off overcommit. (I think you use sysconfig to do that)
On Wednesday, March 7, 2018 at 12:01:14 AM UTC-7, Jasen Betts wrote:uch memory that it causes the machine to have kernel processes or drivers c= rash.
On 2018-03-06, joecook@gmail.com <joecook@gmail.com> wrote:
Running on a system that has no swap, and it seems users can use so m=
ble to all user processes. Or lacking that, for a particular user across = all that user's processes.I'm looking for a way to limit the total amount of user memory availa=
limit in ulimit doesn't quite do the trick, because I want to allow a user=Unfortunately, setting a "max processes" and "max memory per process"=
le with the time to help the people with old computers. Honestly, what lie?= =20=20Any suggestions?=20
Turn off overcommit. (I think you use sysconfig to do that)
=20
--=20
This email has not been checked by half-arsed antivirus software
=20
=20
I bet Paul F. Riddle thinks my life was perfect.=20
=20
Right now there are too many "works for me" Mac users and not enough peop=
=20hs of Paul F. Riddle's narcissism. Yup. It seems this is what we have to de=
You haven't been in multiple groups to even partially figure out the dept=
=20our words to realize his craving to call everyone a sock.=20
I would reply to Paul F. Riddle at once but he is a cretin who distorts y=
=20cookie
I often reverse engineer beetles with my mind.=20
=20
Just some names Steve Carroll has used
"Evil" John *
"Evil" Snit *
Big Crotch on a Small Fish
Cornelius Munshower
CSMA Moderator
Edward Stanfield
Fretwiz *
Hitman Hero
Measles
Petruzzellis Kids
Sigmond
Slaveen
Smit
Steve C *
Steve Camoll *
Steve Carroll <noone@xxxxxxxxxxx> *
Steve Carroll <stevecarroll@xxxxxxxxxxx> *
Steve Carroll <trollkiller@xxxxxx> *
Steve Carroll's Dog *
Steve Carrolll *
Steve Carrroll *
Yevette Owens
Yobo_Obyo
=20
=20
--
This broke the Internet! http://www.5z8.info/-php-deactivate_phishing_filter-48-_e3m8dt_malicious-=
https://youtu.be/E3m_i-x92D0
Jonas Eklundh
